Multiple Lines and Levels of Evidence


Project Team: Richard Norris, Peter Liston, Sue Nichols, James Mugodo, Mike Peat, Julie Gallimore

The Application of Multiple Lines and Levels of Evidence (MLLE) to an ecological question is new, and it is new to all of us.

  • Lines of evidence = evidence coming from different groups of animals or process measures (diatoms, birds, fish, benthic metabolism).
  • Levels of evidence = evidence within a particular line (diatoms) that applies to the different criteria (presence of a biological response, specificity of association, etc).

The D240 team concluded that we needed to conduct a pilot application of MLLE to clarify our application of the technique in project D240. The University of Canberra team has led the pilot with the other team members providing input primarily via email discussion. We needed to clarify our understanding and use of MLLE, first by making the distinction between MLLE and WOE (weight of evidence):

  • WOE involves accumulation of evidence that supports the hypothesis until one concludes that the hypothesis has been proven.
  • MLLE also accumulates evidence but requires that one searches for evidence that would support alternative hypotheses.
MLLE has been used for two quite different purposes; 1) assessment of condition at a site, and 2) evaluating causality between a potential stressor and a biological response. In project D240 we are trialing MLLE to assess causality. We are refining the technique at two levels; 1) ensuring that the different levels of evidence are meaningful and practical when we apply them and: 2) developing a series of decision points about the application of MLLE data that will form a framework for its application. The pilot application currently in progress is identifying uncertainties, decision points and data needs. Issues under consideration include:

  • The definition and quantification of the levels of evidence;
  • steps in the overall MLLE framework;
  • the type of question to be asked/answerd;
  • what are comparable studies;
  • what are the rules regarding the literatue search;
  • categories used to record information from comparable studies (line, response, study type, alpha and beta levels, effect size, etc.);
  • how do we weight the evidence;
  • how do we sub-group the lines of evidence;
  • how will we use the various lines and levels of evidence to provide confidence in our conclusions.
  • The pilot is due for completion by 31 March 2004.

Professor Richard Norris
Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Telephone: (02) 6201 2543 Facsimile: (02) 6201 5038 Email: [surname]@aerg.canberra.edu.au
UC Home | Site Index | Search UC | Help

The Norris Crew

o Home Page
o People
o Publications
o Grants
o Project Summaries
o Affiliations
o Project Opportunities